Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/638
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSujithra, R-
dc.contributor.authorVenkatesan, R-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-13T12:49:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-13T12:49:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/638-
dc.description.abstractData gathering plays a pivotal role in wireless sensor networks as it affects the lifetime of the sensor network, and has higher energy consumption than that of communication. Thepossible ways of initiating the data transfer from the sensors to the sink are event driven, query based, time driven and hybrid. For any data gathering scheme, sensorssend their readings to the sink, which is classified into two namely, static sink and mobile sinkbased on the sink mobility. In the static sink approach, sink is placed permanentlyin the sensing environment, and the dataare collected via multi-hop communication. Due tothis, the nodes near the sink deplete its energy at the earliest, andresultin energy hole problem. In order to address this issue, clusterbased data gathering approaches are proposed. In the cluster based data gathering approach,the nodes that are close to each other are grouped together, and anode in the group is randomly selected as cluster head, whichcollects the information from the remaining nodes in the group called cluster members.This approachreduces the number of nodes that participate in the forwarding of data to the sink. It also reduced the energy hole problem, whereas the lifetime of the CH near the sink remained an issue, which was addressed by the ME data gathering approach. In ME data gathering, ME visits every sensor node in its transmission range and collects the information from it. Though it reducethe energy hole problem. The data gathering latency is anopen issue which is addressed by introducing rendezvous points. ivIn the rendezvous points, ME starts collecting the information from a particular data collection point instead of visiting every sensor node in its transmission range. However, it improves the speed of the mobile element data gathering by introducing the data collection points, the mobile element should wait until all its sensor nodes upload its data. Hence, data gathering latency remains an issue. Furthermore, sensor nodes transmit its data to the mobile element via multi-hop communication, which results in energy hole problem. By considering the above mentioned points, the following data gathering approaches are proposed: Threshold based Toward Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering (T-TEEBDG) approach, Swift and Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering (SEEBDG) approach, Energy Efficient Mobile element Data Gathering (EEMDG) approach, Query based Dynamic Clustering (QDC) approach and Genetic Algorithm based Energy Efficient Data Gathering(GAEEDG) approach.The first three proposed data gathering approaches concentrates on mobile element data gathering issues and their solutions. On the contrary, the last two approaches concentrate on the cluster based static sink data gathering issues and its solutions.Firstly, the proposed T-TEEBDG approach is a cluster based energy conservation scheme. The main objective is to reduce the data gathering latency and improve the network lifetime by controlling the nodes that are communicating with the ME based on the threshold value. The sensing value of the node that reaches the threshold value is only allowed to communicate with the ME. However, it improves the speed of the ME data gathering by controlling the nodes that are communicating with the ME, data are transmitted to the ME via multi-hop communication because of its limited communication range and hence results in energy hole problem again. vFurther to improve the performance of T-TEEBDG, the SEEBDG approachesare proposed. It is a cluster free energy conservation scheme for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In order to reduce the multi-hop communication, region partitioning is carried out based on the communication range of the resource rich node named local data collector (LDC). LDC transmits its request using free space model because of its high transceiver capacity. But data is collected from the sensor nodes in the local sensing region via multi-hop communication. Hence, energy hole problem still remains. In order to reduce the multi-hop communication, the nodes that are communicating with the ME is controlled based on the threshold value. Therefore, only minimal amount of nodes goes for multi-hop communication. For further improvement, an Unmanned Aerial vehicle (UAV) is used not only to collect the information but also to improve the speed of the datagathering. However, it reduces the data gathering latency by introducing LDC; ME should visit every LDC and collects the information from it. Hence, the data gathering latency still remains unsolved. In order to improve this, EEMDG approach is proposed.In EEBDG approach, ME collects the information from only the special nodes named buffering nodes and visits its entire Buffering Node (BN). But, it collects the information only from the BNs that are in critical situation and thus increases the speed of the data gathering and network lifetime.QDC approach is proposed to improve the performance of the cluster based static sink data gathering approach. In traditional clustering, all the sensor nodes in the sensing environment is considered while forming the cluster and it increases the cluster count and its density. Furthermore, cluster head transmits its collected information to the static sink via other cluster heads, which makes the CH near the sink deplete its energy quickly. The main objective of the QDC approach is to reducethe energy consumption by vicontrolling cluster countand its density, and increasethe network lifetime by using relay element based routing.In which, the nodes satisfying the query are only allowed to participate in the clustering process. Others immediately go to the sleep mode. It reduces the count of clusters formed and increasesthe network lifetime.The cluster head that proximate to BS is taken as the first level cluster head and it uses a free space model to transmit the data to BS. The cluster heads, whichare out of BS proximity is taken as the second level cluster head, whichtransmits data to BS with the help of relay node. The relay nodes are resource rich nodes that transmit the data to BS via other relay node. Hence, the load is balanced.To further improve the performance of the QDCapproach, a GAEEDG approachhas been proposed. In which,the Genetic Algorithm (GA) is applied to minimize the count of the cluster formed and maximize the network lifetime in terms of rounds.From the simulation results, it can be concluded that these proposed approaches outperforms the benchmarking system in various aspects viz network lifetime, data gathering latency and packet delivery ratio.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAnna Universityen_US
dc.subjectAssumptionsen_US
dc.subjectClusteren_US
dc.subjectScalabilityen_US
dc.subjectThresholden_US
dc.subjectToleranten_US
dc.titleApproaches to improve efficiency of data gathering in wireless sensor networksen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Computer Science & Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
abstract 9.pdfABSTRACT17.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.